Apolat Legal

This article summarises 5 key considerations to help businesses carry out employment termination in a lawful, transparent, and safe manner, including: Demonstrating the basis for organizational restructuring, developing a labour utilization plan, prioritizing retraining, consulting with the employee representative organization, and providing timely notice.

Termination of an employment contract due to organizational restructuring carries significant legal risks for employers. In the context of restructuring, streamlining the organizational system, or applying new technologies, employers must strictly comply with the procedures prescribed by law to avoid potential disputes.This article summarizes 5 key considerations to help businesses carry out employment termination in a lawful, transparent, and safe manner, including: demonstrating the basis for organizational restructuring, developing a labor utilization plan, prioritizing retraining, consulting with the employee representative organization, and providing timely notice. These are mandatory requirements that businesses must pay close attention to during the personnel restructuring process.

1. Enterprises must retain documentation evidencing organizational restructuring 

Current laws do not provide specific guidelines or definitions as to what constitutes a change in organizational structure. As a result, the application of restructuring as a legal basis for terminating labor contracts largely depends on each enterprise. 

To minimize legal risks in the event of disputes arising from such terminations, enterprises should issue and retain documentation that clearly demonstrates the implementation of organizational restructuring. Specifically, companies should issue internal documents such as restructuring decisions, workforce reallocation plans, and official notices regarding changes to the organizational structure. 

2. Issuing a labor utilization plan 

In cases where changes in organizational structure affect the employment of many employees, the employer is required to develop and implement a labor utilization plan.6 

Prior to issuing this plan, the enterprise must consult with the grassroots-level employees’ representative organization. In practice, in many localities, if the enterprise does not have the grassroots-level employees’ representative organization (typically the grassroots trade union), it may need to seek written opinions from the directly superior trade union instead. The process of requesting support or opinion from the superior trade union may take considerable time to complete.7 For compliance purposes, the enterprise should retain written opinions provided by either the grassroots or superior trade union regarding the proposed labor utilization plan. 

Within 15 days from the date the plan is approved, the enterprise is required to publicly notify the affected employees. This may be done by posting the plan at the workplace or by sending it directly to employees via email. In addition, the enterprise should retain evidence of the disclosure, such as photographs of the public notice or email delivery confirmations, as proof of having fulfilled its legal obligations. 

3. Prioritizing employee retraining for continued employment 

Retraining employees to assign them to new positions is not a mandatory obligation for employers in cases of termination due to organizational restructuring.8 However, during the preparation phase for contract termination, if the enterprise has recruitment needs or plans to reassign staff to newly created or vacant positions, it must be able to demonstrate that the affected employees are not suitable for those roles. 

Specifically, the employer must provide clear and objective grounds for the inability to place the affected employees in available positions, particularly when such positions require specific qualifications, such as academic degrees, professional certificates, specialized experience, or foreign language proficiency. For instance, if a vacant accounting position requires a professional accounting certificate or prior experience in finance and accounting, and the affected employee does not meet these criteria, the company should retain documentation evidencing the objective and reasonable basis for exclusion. 

4. Consulting with the grassroots trade union on termination decisions 

The termination of employees in this context may only be carried out after consultation with the employee representative organization at the workplace (typically the grassroots trade union).9 In cases where the enterprise has not established a grassroots trade union, the enterprise may need to consult with the directly superior trade union, subject to local laws and prevailing administrative practices. The enterprise should also ensure that all relevant documents and written records evidencing the consultation process with the trade union concerning the proposed termination are properly retained. 

5. Notice of Termination 

The enterprise shall notify such dismissal 30 days in advance to the provincial-level People’s Committee where it is headquartered and the employees.10 Although current laws do not prescribe a specific form for such notice, to ensure transparency and demonstrate compliance with legal requirements, the company should issue the notice in writing and retain evidence that it was properly delivered within the required timeframe.


(6) Clause 3, Article 42 of the Labor Code 2019.

(7) https://apolatlegal.com/are-enterprises-required-to-establish-grassroots-trade-unions/, Accessed on June 20, 2025.

(8) Clause 3, Article 42 of the Labor Code 2019. 

(9) Clause 6, Article 42 of the Labor Code 2019. 

(10) Clause 6, Article 42 of the Labor Code 2019.


Disclaimers:

This article is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide any legal advice for any particular case. The legal provisions referenced in the content are in effect at the time of publication but may have expired at the time you read the content. We therefore advise that you always consult a professional consultant before applying any content.

For issues related to the content or intellectual property rights of the article, please email cs@apolatlegal.vn.

Apolat Legal is a law firm in Vietnam with experience and capacity to provide consulting services related to Employment and contact our team of lawyers in Vietnam via email info@apolatlegal.com.

Please Login or Register for Free now to view all updates and articles

In addition to free-to-view updates and articles, you can also subscribe to the full Legal Centrix Vietnam Service including access to:

  • Overview notes on the law
  • Thousands of high quality translations of legislation covering all key business areas
  • Legal and tax updates
  • Articles on important legal and tax issues
  • Weekly email alerts
  • Sophisticated web platform and search

Legal Centrix is trusted by top law and accounting firms.

Apolat Legal

Established in 2014, Apolat Legal is a licensed law firm providing a board range of legal services in multiple practice areas for domestic and international clients. The firm commits resolving legal issues regarding businesses thoroughly and in the most beneficial way for various clients in Vietnam.

Apolat Legal is also honored to receive numerous recognitions and/or articles posted by world-leading and local organizations and publications including: The Law Association for Asia and the Pacific (LawAsia, 1966), The Legal500, IP Link, AIPPI, IP Coster, Lexology, Global Trade Review (GTR), The Saigon Times, etc.

Apolat Legal lawyers have long been recognized for their legal expertise and paid attention to their dedication in work as well as the capacity to take advantages from their relationship to maximize the interests of clients. The lawyers will be grouped into specialized teams, directly participate in each case to provide advices and close support to customers, thereby quickly completing the assigned work in the most effective way.

APOLAT LEGAL’s reputation and the quality of its services are reflected by its clients. We are serving nearly 1,000 clients both local and foreign clients. Some past and current long-term clients which the firm worked with such as: LG Electronics, Coastal Living Land Joint Stock Company, Wall Street English, Hochiki Asia Pacific Pte.Ltd, Asus Technology (Vietnam) Company Limited, AEON Mall Vietnam, Baskin Robbin, Citigym, Woori Bank Vietnam Limited, Central Group, CJ Gemadept Logistics Holdings Company Limited, K Group Company Limited, Digiworld Corp., Yellow Cab Pizza, Bamboo Capital Joint Stock Company, Sinobright Pharma Co. Limited, Mayekawa, Sky Music Jsc, Oxalis Holiday Company Limited, PGT Holdings, Vinacapital, Capitaland, Donghyup,...

Click here to view the author's profile

Cookies On
Our Website
We use cookies on our website. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our site and how to change your cookie settings please click here to view our cookie policy. By continuing to use this site without changing your settings you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.