In Vietnam, company restructuring can be conducted under the forms of company split, de-merger, merger, consolidation, and corporate form conversion. Insolvency forms consist of temporary suspension of operation, voluntary or involuntary liquidation, and bankruptcy. Each form will be discussed in a separate section below.
This article will not discuss other licensing procedures or aspects that may be triggered by a merger such as procedures under the Investment Law 2014 if the Original Co (as defined below) is a foreign-invested company or otherwise has an investment certificate, competition law, employment, and tax.
The Enterprise Law 2014 provides that one JSC or one LLC (Original Co) could split (chia) its members or shareholders and its assets to form two or more new companies (New Cos).[1] After a company split, the Original Co will cease to exist.[2] By referring to splitting members or shareholders of a company, the draftsman of the Enterprise Law 2014 must have meant to refer to splitting the charter capital of the Original Co among its shareholders or members instead of physically splitting them.
The Enterprise Law 2014:
i) allows a company to be split into new companies of different types not just companies of the same types. However, the Enterprise Law 2014 does not clarify whether New Cos must be incorporated in the form of an LLC or a JSC or in other forms such as a partnership or private enterprise; and
ii) clearly allows shareholders or members of a company to be split in a company split in addition to assets of such companies.
In a company split, the following three things should be addressed at least:
i) how much assets each New Co should have;
ii) how much charter capital (or equity capital) each New Co should have; and
iii) how each New Co’s charter capital should be allocated among the shareholders or members of New Co.
The Enterprise Law 2014 tries to address these three issues by introducing some company split methods. Unfortunately, the wording of the Enterprise Law 2014 is so convoluted and ambiguous that it is not possible to understand the real meaning of each method.
Under Article 192.1(1) of the Enterprise Law 2014, a company may be split in the following manner:
“Part of capital contribution or shares of members or shareholders together with assets corresponding to the value of the share of capital contribution or shares shall be distributed to new companies in accordance with the ratio of ownership in the company being split and corresponding to the value of assets transferred to new companies.”[3]
The wording of Article 192.1(a) is unclear in many aspects including:
i) Article 192.1(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014 refers to a ratio but does not clarify the numerator and the denominator of such ratio; and
ii) it is not clear if the word “value” used in Article 192.1(1) of the Enterprise Law 2014 refers to an absolute value or a ratio. It should be a ratio because the total amount of assets of an Original Co is usually different from the total amount of charter capital of such Original Co.
Despite the lack of clarity, it appears that Article 192.1(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014 is trying to describe a company split of an Original Co where there is no change to the shareholder structure of each New Co by pro-rata dividing the assets and charter capital among the New Cos. In particular, the Enterprise Law 2014 seems to contemplate that an Original Co could be split by the following mechanics:[4]
i) allocating all of the assets originally held by Original Co (Original Assets) among the New Cos so that each of New Cos will own a portion of the Original Assets (New Co’s Assets) and all New Cos will together own all Original Assets. This is because Original Co will cease to exist after the company split as such all Original Assets should be allocated among the New Cos which are incorporated as a result of the company split;
ii) allocating the charter capital of the Original Co (Original Equity) among the New Cos so that the charter capital of each New Co (New Co’s Equity) will bear to the Original Equity the same proportion as the New Co’s Assets bears to the Original Assets. This is because discussed at 1.5.2(a), it is more logical to use ratio instead of absolute value in the context of a company split;
iii) allocating all the liabilities of the Original Co (Original Liabilities) among the New Cos so that the total liabilities of each New Co (New Co’s Liabilities) will bear to the Original Liabilities the same proportion as the New Co’s Assets bears to the Original Assets. This is to ensure that the total asset of a New Co will be equal to such New Co’s Liabilities plus New Co’s Equity; and
iv) each of New Cos will be owned by the same set of shareholders or members in the Original Co, each of them will own the same ownership percentage in each of New Cos as in the Original Co. This is because under Article 192.1(a) only a portion of a shareholder’s shares in an Original Co is allocated to a New Co which implies that each shareholder will have shares in every New Co.
Under Article 192.1(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014, a company may also be split in the following manner:
“All of the capital contribution or shares of one or more members or shareholders together with assets corresponding to the value of their shares or capital contribution shall be transferred to new companies”[5]
Again for the same reasons discussed at 1.5, the wording of Article 192.1(b) is not clear. That said, it appears that Article 192.1(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014 is trying to describe a company split of an Original Co where there is change to the shareholder structure of each New Co by allocating different sets of shareholders or members to each New Co. In particular, the Enterprise Law 2014 seems to contemplate that an Original Co could be split by the following mechanics:[6]
i) allocating different sets of shareholders or members of the Original Co to different New Cos such that a shareholder or member of the Original Co will become a shareholder or member of one New Co only and all shareholders or members of New Cos will together be the same as shareholders or members of Original Co. This is because Article 192.1(b) seems to allocate “all capital contribution or shares” held by one member or shareholder to a New Co;
ii) each New Co’s Equity is the aggregate value of all portion of Original Equity held by the shareholders or members who are allocated to own such New Co;
iii) each New Co’s Assets will bear to the Original Assets the same proportion as such New Co’s Equity bear to the Original Equity; and
iv) allocating all Original Liabilities among the New Cos so that each New Co’s Liabilities will bear to the Original Liabilities the same proportion as the New Co’s Assets bears to the Original Assets. This is to ensure that the total asset of a New Co will be equal to such New Co’s Liabilities plus New Co’s Equity.
The key difference between a partition split and a pro-rata split is that after a partition split, the shareholders or members structure of each New Co is different. On the other hand, after a pro-rata split, shareholders or members structure of each New Co is the same.
Article 192.1(c) of the Enterprise Law 2014 provides that a company may also be split using a combination of the method under Article 192.1(a) (i.e., pro-rata splitting) and Article 192.1(b) (i.e., partition splitting).
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, procedures for splitting an LLC or a JSC are as follows:
i) The owners of the Original Co[7] will pass a resolution approving the splitting of the Original Co (Owner Restructuring Decision).[8] The Owner Restructuring Decision must at least have statutory details.[9]
ii) The Owner Restructuring Decision must be sent to all creditors and notified to employees within 15 days from the date of its issuance;[10]
iii) owners of New Cos must approve the charter, elect or appoint enterprise officers of New Cos and carry out procedures to incorporate New Cos. The application for incorporating New Cos must include the Owner Restructuring Decision;[11]
iv) the Business Registration Authority will record (1) members or shareholders of each New Co, (2) the number and ratio of ownership of shares or capital contribution of members or shareholders of each New Co; (3) the charter capital of each New Co in accordance with the applicable splitting method (see paragraphs 1.4 to 1.9);[12] and
v) the Business Registration Authority will “update the legal status” of the Original Co in the National Database upon issuance of BRCs to New Cos. If the head office address of a New Co is located outside the province where the Original Co has its head office, the Business Registration Authority in the province where the New Co has its head office must notify the Business Registration Authority in the province where the Original Co has its head office in order to update the legal status of the Original Co in the National Database.[13]
A company split procedures are much more complicated than procedures for setting up a new company as it involves simultaneous termination of one company and incorporation of more than one company. Therefore, unless the Government provides more detailed guidance on company split, it would remain difficult to implement a company split in practice. For example, the Enterprise Law 2005 is silent about the fact that as a result of a company split, the charter capital of a New Co would be smaller than that of the Original Co. In practice, based on the ground that there is no procedures for registering a reduced charter capital, some Business Registration Authorities have refused to approve applications for splitting a company if the splitting results in a reduction of charter capital of the Original Co.
After completion of a company split, all New Cos remain jointly and severally liable for the liabilities of Original Co before the split unless otherwise agreed with the Original Co’s creditors.[14] The joint and several obligations imposed by the Enterprise Law 2014 on New Cos will likely make it more difficult for New Cos to attract new investors as there is no clean break between New Cos and Original Co. A potential new investor in a New Co will still need to conduct due diligence into both Original Co and New Co to determine the exposures that New Co may have from the operation of Original Co in the past.
Article 193.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014 provides that an LLC or a JSC may be “de-merged” (tách) by transferring a part of the assets or rights and obligations of the existing company (Original Co) to establish one or more new LLCs or JSCs without terminating the existence of the Original Co. The New LLCs or JSCs established as a result of a company de-merger are referred to as New Cos. The Original Co exists after a company de-merger is referred to as the Surviving Co.
The Enterprise Law 2014 does not require New Cos to have the same corporate form as the Original Co.
The following issues may arise from the definition of a company de-merger under the Enterprise Law 2014:
i) the Enterprise Law 2014 requires New Co to be either an LLC or a JSC. However, it is not entirely clear if Original Co is an LLC, then New Co could be a JSC; and
ii) essentially, a company split is the same as a company de-merger with the only exception that in a company de-merger, the Original Co becomes the Surviving Co while the Original Co ceases to exist after a company split. Despite the similarity between a company split and a company de-merger, the Enterprise Law 2014 adopts entirely different wording for two definitions. The difference in two definitions of two similar restructuring events creates an implication that they are two different events.
The Enterprise Law 2014 also provides three methods of company de-merger which are similar to the methods of company splits (see 1.4 - 1.9). Unfortunately, the provisions on de-merger methods in the Enterprise Law 2014 use the almost same wording as the provisions on company split methods and therefore, have the same level of ambiguity (see 1.3 and 1.5).
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, the procedures for de-merging of an LLC or a JSC are as follows:
i) the owners of the Original Co[15] will pass a resolution approving the de-merging of the Original Co (Owner Restructuring Decision).[16] The Owner Restructuring Decision must at least have statutory details.[17]
ii) the Owner Restructuring Decision must be sent to all creditors and notified to employees within 15 days from the date of its issuance;[18]
iii) owners of New Cos must approve the charter, and elect or appoint enterprise officers of New Cos and carry out procedures to incorporate New Cos. The application for incorporating New Cos must include the Owner Restructuring Decision;[19] and
iv) the Surviving Co must register any reduction to the charter capital and the number of members corresponding to their shares of capital contribution or shares and the number of members reduced at the same time when New Cos are being incorporated.[20]
The Enterprise Law 2014 requires the Surviving Co to register its reduced charter capital as a result of a company de-merger.
The company de-merger procedures are much more complicated than the procedures for setting up a new company as they involve simultaneous incorporation of more than one company (i.e., New Cos) and modification to another company (i.e. Surviving Co). Therefore, unless the Government provides more detailed guidance on company de-merger, it would remain difficult to implement a company de-merger in practice.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014,[21] after completion of a company de-merger, the Surviving Co and New Cos will be jointly liable for unpaid debts, labor contracts and other property obligations of the Original Co, unless otherwise agreed among the Surviving Co, New Cos, creditors, customers, and employees. Again, similar to the case of a company split (see 1.12), the default liabilities imposed on New Cos established as a result of a de-merger make it difficult for New Cos to attract new investors due to the lack of a clean break with the Original Co.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014,[1] one or more companies (Original Cos) may be merged (sáp nhập) into another company (the Surviving Co), by way of transfer of all lawful assets, rights, obligations and interests to the Surviving Co and, at the same time, terminate the existence of the Original Cos. It is possible to merger companies of different corporate form.
Both the Enterprise Law 2014 and the Enterprise Law 2005 remain silent as to whether it is possible to conduct a cash-out merger[2] whereby one or more shareholders or members of the Original Cos will receive cash (instead of shares or capital contribution) from the Surviving Co and will not become a shareholder in the Surviving Co. Article 195.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014 provides that a merger contract should include provisions regarding conversion of shares of the merging company to shares of the merged company. This may suggest that the regulations on merger under the Enterprise Law 2014 are intended for a stock-for-stock merger but not a cash-out merger. In addition, by referring to the transfer of “all assets and liabilities”, it seems that the Enterprise Law 2014 does not contemplate any leakage of value in case of a company merger.
The procedures for implementing a company merger under the Enterprise Law 2014 are as follows:
Merger contract: Original Cos and the Surviving Co enter into a merger contract (Merger Contract) covering at least statutory details.[3]
Charter of Surviving Co after merger: Original Cos and the Surviving Co must also agree on the charter of the Surviving Co after the merger (Surviving Co Charter);[4]
Corporate approval: owners of the Original Co and the Surviving Co must approve the Merger Contract and Surviving Co Charter.[5] While it is not clear, it appears that if the Surviving Co owns more than 65% charter capital or voting rights of any Original Co, then it is not necessary for such Original Co to obtain a corporate approval.[6] It is not clear why the Enterprise Law 2014 introduces this new exception. This is because:
(a) the exception has effectively removed the right of minority shareholders or members in the relevant Original Co to approve the Merger Contract which may constitute a related party transaction between the Original Co and Surviving Co; and
(b) if the reason for introducing the exception is that 65% voting rights gives the Surviving Co supermajority voting right which is required to approve a merger, then such reason is only correct for an Original Co being a JSC (see Nguyen Quang Vu – Principles of Vietnam’s Enterprise Law (Vol.1) – Section 85.28). For an Original Co being an LLC, the supermajority voting required to approve a merger is 75% (see Nguyen Quang Vu – Principles of Vietnam’s Enterprise Law (Vol.1) – Section 33.9).
Creditor notification: Each of the Original Cos and the Surviving Co must send the Merger Contract to all creditors and notified to employees within 15 days from the date of its approval.[7] It is not clear why the whole Merger Contract must be sent to the Original Co’s creditors given that a Merger Contract may contain many confidential commercial terms between the Original Cos and the Surviving Co.
Business registration: The Surviving Co will carry out procedures to amend its Enterprise Certificate to record the merger.[8] The application for amending the Enterprise Certificate of the Surviving Co must include the Merger Contract, Surviving Co Charter and necessary corporate approvals of the Merger Contract.
Post licensing: After the amendment of Surviving Co’s Enterprise Certificate is issued,
(a) all Original Cos will cease to exist, and the Surviving Co will assume the lawful rights and interest and be liable for unpaid debts, labor contracts and other property obligations of the Original Co;[9] and
(b) the Business Registration Authority will update the legal status of Original Cos in the National Database. If the Original Co is located outside the province where the Surviving Co is located, the Business Registration Authority in charge of Surviving Co must notify the Business Registration Authority in charge of the Original Cos in order for the latter to update the legal status of the Original Cos in the National Database.[10]
The company merger procedures are much more complicated than procedures for setting up a new company as they involve simultaneous liquidation of more than one company (i.e., Original Cos) and modification to another company (i.e., the Surviving Co). Therefore, unless the Government provides more detailed guidance on company merger, it would remain difficult to implement a company merger in practice.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014,[11] two or more companies (Original Cos) may be consolidated (hợp nhất) into a new company (New Co), and at the same time, terminate the existence of Original Cos. The Enterprise Law 2014 does not clearly define how a company consolidation is carried out.
That said, in essence, a company consolidation should be treated in the same manner as a company merger except that a New Co is established as a result of a company consolidation instead of a Surviving Co in the context of a company merger.
The procedures for implementing a company merger under the Enterprise Law 2014 are as follows:
Consolidation contract: all Original Cos will enter into a consolidation contract (Consolidation Contract) covering at least statutory details.[12]
Charter of New Co: Original Cos must also agree on the charter of the New Co after the consolidation (New Co Charter);[13]
Corporate approval: Owners of the Original Co must approve the Consolidation Contract and New Co Charter and appoint enterprise officers of New Co.[14]
Creditor notification: Each of Original Cos must send the Consolidation Contract to all creditors and notified to employees within 15 days from the date of its approval.[15] It is not clear why the whole Consolidation Contract must be sent to Original Co’s creditors given that a Consolidation Contract may contain many confidential commercial terms between Original Cos.
Business registration: Owners of Original Cos will carry out procedures to incorporate New Co to record the consolidation.[16] The application for amending the Enterprise Certificate of the New Co must include the Consolidation Contract, New Co Charter and necessary corporate approvals of the Consolidation Contract.[17]
Post-licensing: After the amendment of New Co’s Enterprise Certificate is issued,
(a) all Original Cos will cease to exist, and New Co will assume the lawful rights and interest and be liable for unpaid debts, labor contracts and other property obligations of the Original Co;[18] and
(b) the Business Registration Authority will update the legal status of Original Cos in the National Database. If the Original Co is located outside the province where theNew Co is located, the Business Registration Authority in charge of the New Co must notify the Business Registration Authority in charge of the Original Cos in order for the latter to update the legal status of the Original Cos in the National Database.[19]
The company consolidation procedures are much more complicated than procedures for setting up a new company as they involve simultaneous liquidation of more than one company (i.e., Original Cos) and incorporation of another company (i.e., New Co). Therefore, unless the Government provides more detailed guidance on company merger, it would remain difficult to implement a company merger in practice.
Article 4.25 of the Enterprise Law 2014 provides that “corporate form conversion” (chuyển đổi loại hình doanh nghiệp) is a method of company restructuring. There is no further clarification of what a corporate form conversion means. However, since the Enterprise Law 2014 adds the word “form” in the description,[20] it is reasonable to say that corporate form conversion means a change of corporate governance structure of a company (the Original Co) such that the Original Co will be organised as a company of different form (the Converted Co). The Converted Co will operate in accordance with a set of provisions under the Enterprise Law 2014 different from those applicable to Original Co.
The Enterprise Law 2014 now contains procedures for converting:
a JSC into a Single LLC;[21]
a JSC into a Multiple LLC;[22]
a Single LLC or a Multiple LLC into a JSC;[23] and
a private enterprise into a Single LLC or a Multiple LLC.[24]
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, the procedures for converting an Original Co into a Converted Co are generally as follows:
Corporate/transfer action: a corporate form conversion is usually triggered by a voluntary action by the Original Co or by a transfer of shares or capital contribution among shareholders or members of Original Co. For example, if a shareholder in an Original Co being a JSC buys out the shares held by all other shareholders then the Original Co will become a Single LLC which in turn triggers a corporate form conversion process.[25]
Business registration: Original Co must apply to register a corporate form conversion with the Business Registration Authority within 15 days after the conversion is complete.[26] The Business Registration Authority has five business days to register the conversion and issue a replacement Enterprise Certificate presumably to record the incorporation of the Converted Co.[27]
Other specific requirements: If a JSC becomes a Single LLC due to a transfer of shares, then the transfer must occur at market price or at a valuation based on assets methods, discount cash flow method or other valuation method.[28]
In all cases except for the case where Original Co is a private enterprise, the Enterprise Law 2014 requires the Converted Co to automatically assume all lawful rights and interests of the Original Co and be responsible for debts, including tax debts, labour contracts and other obligations of the Original Co.[29]
However, it is unusual that under both the Enterprise Law 2014 and the Enterprise Law 2005, when a company (i.e., the Original Co) converts into another corporate form, then such company ceases to exist and the Converted Co is a new company inheriting all assets or liabilities of the first company. This is because other than corporate form, there is no change to the assets and liabilities of the Original Co. On the other hand, the legal termination of Original Co may have an adverse impact on many contracts (e.g., credit agreements) currently performed by such company.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014,
an enterprise may temporarily suspend its business but must notify the business registration office in writing of the point of time and period of temporary suspension or resumption of its business no later than fifteen days before the date of temporary suspension or resumption of its business prior to the notified time-limit;[30] or
the authority may require an enterprise to suspend its business temporarily in any line of conditional business when the authority discovers that the enterprise fails to satisfy all of the conditions stipulated by law.[31]
During the temporary suspension period, the relevant enterprise must pay in full any outstanding amount of tax, continue to pay debts and finalise the performance of contracts signed with customers and employees, unless otherwise agreed by the enterprise, creditors, customers, and employees.[32]
The provisions regarding temporary suspension of operation of a company under the Enterprise Law 2014 are similar to those under the Enterprise Law 2005. While the Enterprise Law 2014 is silent, under Decree 78/2015, the temporary suspension period should not exceed one year.[33]
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, a company must be liquidated in the following cases:[34]
the duration of operation stipulated in the charter of the company expires;
the owners, members or shareholders of the company decide to liquidate the company; or
the company does not have the minimum number of members or shareholders for a period of six consecutive months and do not conduct procedures for corporate form conversion.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, a company can only be liquidated if:
it is certain that it can settle all debts and other property obligations of the company; and
there is no pending a dispute involved the company at a court or arbitration. This is a new requirement under the Enterprise Law 2014.
The requirements for a voluntary liquidation are quite strict. This is because only a minor dispute between the relevant company with its counterparty during the liquidation (e.g., dispute with an unhappy employee) can delay the whole process. Therefore, a company under a voluntary liquidation process will tend to settle all disputes arising during the liquidation process to avoid delay.
A voluntary liquidation process will be initiated by a Liquidation Decision.[36] The Liquidation Decision must include, among other things, the following information:
(a) reason for liquidation;
(b) time-limit and procedures for contract liquidation and debt settlement; and
(c) plan for the settlement of liabilities arising out of labour contracts.[37]
Within seven business days since the date of the Liquidation Decision, the company must:
send the Liquidation Decision to its employees, the Business Registration Authority, and tax authorities;
publish the Liquidation Decision on the National Portal together with a plan for the settlement of debt by the dissolving company, if any;[38]
display the Liquidation Decision at the head office, branch(es), and representative office(s) of the company;[39] and
send the Liquidation Decision to the company’s creditors and other relevant parties, if there are any outstanding financial liabilities.[40]
Under the Enterprise Law 2014, the sale of assets of a company under liquidated may be directly organised and conducted by the owner, Members’ Council or the Board of the company, as the case may be. Alternatively, the company may have a separate asset liquidation organisation (tổ chức thanh lý) if the company’s charter allows so.[41] As the charter of a company already has detailed provisions on how a Members’ Council or a Board should operate, having a separate liquidation organisation appears to be redundant.
Based on the Liquidation Decision, the plan for debt settlement and agreement with the counter-parties under relevant contracts, the dissolving company will liquidate its assets, contracts and settle its all liabilities within six months after the date of the Liquidation Decision.[42] There is no general requirement for a public auction of the dissolving company. However, the Tendering Law 2013 may apply if the dissolving company is a State-owned enterprise.
According to the Enterprise Law 2014, the proceeds obtained from a voluntary liquidation will be allocated in accordance with the following waterfall:[43]
first, to settle debts owed to employees such as salaries, severance allowance or social insurance;
second, to settle taxes owed to the Government;
third, to settle other liabilities including liquidation expenses; and
fourth, to distribute the remaining proceeds among owners, members or shareholders of the dissolving company in proportion to their shareholding or capital contribution percentage.[44]
Unlike in the case of bankruptcy liquidation (see 9.22), under the Enterprise Law 2014, tax payment now has a higher priority in liquidation payment ranking than other liabilities of a company (except payment due to employees).[45] Under the Enterprise Law 2005, tax payment and other debts of a company have the same priority. This new change seems to create a major preference for the Government over other creditors in a voluntary liquidation of a company. Therefore, in practice, the Government may prefer to have a company to go through voluntary liquidation instead of bankruptcy liquidation.
The provisions on voluntary liquidation of the Enterprise Law 2014 do not distinguish potential different liquidation preference among shareholders of different classes in a JSC. Instead, the Enterprise Law 2014 simply provides that the remaining proceeds of a dissolving company will be distributed among shareholders according to their shareholding percentage. It is not clear if the charter of a JSC provides for a different liquidation preference, then the charter will prevail the provision of the Enterprise Law 2014.
Within five business days from the date on which all liabilities of the dissolving company are settled, the legal representative of the dissolving company must submit a Liquidation Application (Liquidation Application) to the Business Registration Authority.[46] The Liquidation Application comprises of:[47]
notice on the company liquidation;
report on asset liquidation; list of creditors and debts (including tax, social insurance, employees’ benefits, etc.);
seal and the seal registration (if any); and
the Enterprise Certificate of the dissolving company.
Unlike Decree 102/2010,[48] the Enterprise Law 2014 does not require the Liquidation Application to include confirmation by tax authority that the dissolving company does not owe any tax. Instead, under Article 59.3 of Decree 78/2015, after receiving the Liquidation Application, the Business Registration Authority is required to send the information of registered dissolution to relevant tax authorities. Within two business days, the tax authorities must send their opinion on the liquidation to the Business Registration Authority. Article 59.4 of Decree 78/2015 further provides that within five business days after receiving the Liquidation Application the Business Registration Authority must update the legal status of the dissolving company on the National Portal with the status of “dissolved” if the Business Registration Authority has not received an objection opinion from the tax authorities. It is not clear whether the absence of a response from the tax authorities after two business days (after sending the information of registered dissolution)] could qualify as “no objection opinion”. In addition, the dissolving company must file a dossier regarding completion of tax liabilities and termination of tax code with the relevant tax authorities (and Custom General Department to clear import-export tax liabilities before filing the dossier with the tax authorities) before filing the Liquidation Application.
The Board directors, members of the Members’ Council, the owner (as the case may be), together with the General Director and the legal representative(s) of the dissolving company must be responsible for the accuracy and truthfulness of the Liquidation Application.[49] If there is any inaccuracy or falsity in the Liquidation Application, then for the period of five years after the Liquidation Application is submitted, the aforementioned persons must
jointly and severally be responsible for any outstanding liability and debts of the dissolving company. It is not clear whether the liability under this provision is intended to be a strict liability which will apply to all relevant managers whether or not such managers do not know or do not approve the inaccuracy or falsity; and
be individually responsible before law for any consequences arising from such inaccuracy and falsity.[50]
The provision on liability relating Liquidation Application under the Enterprise Law 2014 is similar to those under Decree 102/2010.[51]
The Business Registration Authority will officially update the legal status of a dissolving company to be a dissolved company in the National Database:
five business days after the Liquidation Application is submitted; or
if earlier, 180 days after the Liquidation Decision is published in the National Portal provided that there is no objection to the Liquidation Decision during that 180-day period.[52]
After the Liquidation Decision is issued, the dissolving company and its enterprise officers are not allowed to conducts various acts including:[53]
hiding or dispersing assets;
denouncing or reducing the debt-claiming rights;
converting unsecured debts into secured debts with the company’s assets;
signing new contracts except for those for the company liquidation purposes;
pledging, mortgaging, donating or leasing assets;
terminating the performance of already effective contracts; and
mobilising capital in any forms.
Under the Enterprise Law 2014,[54] a company’s Enterprise Certificate may be revoked in the following circumstances, among other things:
the application for incorporation of the relevant company contains falsified information;
the founding members/shareholders of the relevant company are those prohibited from establishing enterprises under the Enterprise Law 2014 (see Nguyen Quang Vu – Principles of Vietnam’s Enterprise Law (Vol.1) – Section 11);
the relevant company suspends its business activities for one year without notifying the Business Registration Authority and the tax authority (see 6). The requirement for notifying the tax authority is a new requirement;
the relevant company fails to send reports to the Business Registration Authority within six months from the expiry date of the period for sending reports or from the date of written request by the authority. This is new ground for terminating the Enterprise Certificate of a company under the Enterprise Law 2014; and
other cases pursuant to decisions of courts.
The procedures for implementing an involuntary liquidation are as follows:
(i) The Business Registration Authority or the court decides to revoke the Enterprise Certificate of the dissolving company (Liquidation Order);[55]
(ii) the Business Registration Authority will publish the Liquidation Order on the National Portal.[56] While the law is silent, presumably, the Liquidation Order must also be sent to the dissolving company;
(iii) the dissolving company must issue a Liquidation Decision (see 7.4) within 10 days after receipt of the Liquidation Order.[57] If the dissolving company has unpaid financial obligations, it must also prepare a plan on settlement of debts (Debt Settlement Plan) including the name and address of the creditor; the amount of the debt, the time-limit, location and method of payment of such debt; the method and time-limit for dealing with complaints of creditors;[58]
(iv) the Liquidation Decision, the Liquidation Order and, if applicable, Debt Settlement Plan must be sent to the Business Registration Authority, the tax authority, employees and creditors of the dissolving company. The Liquidation Decision and the Liquidation Order must also be displayed at the head office and branch offices of the dissolving company;[59]
(v) after Liquidation Decision, the Liquidation Order and, if applicable, Debt Settlement Plan is issued and displayed, the dissolving company will implement an involuntary liquidation in the same manner as a voluntary liquidation including distribution of liquidation proceeds;[60] and
(vi) the Business Registration Authority will officially update the legal status of a dissolving company to be a dissolved company in the National Database:[61]
(a) five business days after the Liquidation Application is submitted; or
(b) if earlier, 180 days after the Liquidation Order is published in the National Portal provided that there is no objection to the Liquidation Order during that 180-day period.
Managers of a company which is liquidated pursuant to Liquidation Order are jointly and severally liable for their failure to liquidate the company in accordance with the Enterprise Law 2014 and the Liquidation Order.[62]
This article will not discuss in details the treatment of a company when it is insolvent. In general, the remaining paragraphs of this section 9 is a bankruptcy process according to the Bankruptcy Law 2014.[63]
An enterprise is considered insolvent (mất khả năng thanh toán) if it “fails to pay the due debts within three months from the due date”.[64] Resolution 3/2005[65] clarifies that “due debts” are the unsecured debts or partly secured debts, which is expressly recognized by the relevant parties, supported by adequate evidencing documents and free of dispute (this Resolution expired).[66] The court may require further evidence to prove the insolvent status of a company subject to a petition for bankruptcy proceedings.
Petition: An unsecured or partly secured creditor of a company by noticing that the company is in an insolvent status will have the right to file a petition for bankruptcy proceedings against such company together with evidence of the insolvent status.[67] In addition, a shareholder or a group of shareholders holding 20% or more ordinary shares for at least 6 consecutive months may also file a petition for bankruptcy proceedings against such JSC if the JSC is in insolvent status.[68]
Negotiation: The company subject to a bankruptcy petition may negotiate with the claimant within 20 days from the date of receiving the valid petition by the Court. If the negotiation is successful, then the bankruptcy petition could be withdrawn.[69]
Court’s fee: The petitioner must make an advance of the bankruptcy fees determined by the court.[70]
Court: The provincial court of the locality where the company in bankruptcy registered for its business is in charge of bankruptcy cases for companies with “foreign” elements, branches or real estates in different districts. The district-level court will be in charge of bankruptcy cases involving enterprises headquartered in the same district, except cases requiring settlement from provincial courts.[71]
Acceptance of bankruptcy hearing: The Court will issue a decision whether to commence the bankruptcy proceedings within 30 days from the date of acceptance of the petition for bankruptcy proceedings.[72] The claimant (and other creditors in the case of a decision to commence the bankruptcy proceedings) of the company are also entitled to being noticed of such decision.[73]
Appointment of a Receiver: Within three business days from the commencement of bankruptcy proceeding, the court will appoint a receiver (Receiver) (being either qualified individual or company).[74] The Receiver will play a major role in running the company’s operation and liquidating the company’s assets during the bankruptcy proceeding. The Receiver may act as the legal representative of the company if necessary.[75]
Standstill: After the court accepts the petition, the disposal of the company’s secured assets for secured creditors will be temporarily suspended except where the secured assets are in danger of being destroyed or significantly losing their value.[76] In addition, disputes relating to the company’s assets will be suspended by the relevant court or arbitration.[77]
Limitation on operation: The company is also prohibited from:
(i) disbursing and concealing assets,
(ii) settling unsecured debts,
(iii) waiving the right to claim, and
(iv) turning unsecured loans to secured loans.[78]
Any material transaction by the company including material disposal or borrowing must be notified and approved by the Receiver.[79]
List of company’s assets: Within 30 days from the date of receiving the court’s decision to commence bankruptcy proceedings, the company will have to list out an inventory of its assets and determine the value of such assets.[80] Such list of assets including the value of each asset as determined must be promptly sent to the Court.[81]
Preparation of the list of creditors: Within 30 days from the date of the court's decision to commence bankruptcy proceedings, creditors of the company must submit to the Receiver their detailed request for debt payment.[82] Within 15 days from the deadline of sending debt claims, the Receiver must prepare and publish a list of creditors with details of the debts thereof.[83]
Creditors meeting: Within 20 days after completion of the list of creditors or the list of company’s assets, whichever is later, the court will convene the meeting of the company’s creditors to discuss the company’s situation and approve a resolution to recover the company’s business, if the creditors consider that the company is recoverable.[84] If the creditors consider that the company is not recoverable, then the court will decide to commence the liquidation procedures. A creditor meeting requires a quorum of a number of creditors representing at least 51% of the unsecured debts.[85] A decision of the creditor meeting requires the consents of at least 65% of the unsecured debts which will bind all creditors.[86]
Suspension: From the date, the Court decides to commence the bankruptcy proceedings to before the date of announcement of the company’s bankruptcy, if the company is not in bankruptcy the court may issue a decision to suspend the bankruptcy proceedings. Such decision may be appealed by the creditors.[87]
Within 30 days after the creditor meeting decides that the company’s business may be recoverable, a recovery plan will be prepared by the company and sent to the Court, the company’s creditors and the Receiver for their consideration.[88] The plan will then be subjected to the approval of the second meeting of the company’s creditors. The maximum term for the company to implement the business recovery plan is 3 years unless otherwise approved by the meeting of the company’s creditors.[89]
The court will then issue a decision in recognition of the creditors’ resolution on approval of the recovery plan. Once the creditors’ resolution takes effect, the company will be released from various operational restrictions imposed on the company discussed above.[90] However, the company is required to report on the implementation progress every six months.[91]
If the approved recovery is carried out successfully, then the court will terminate the process, and the company will escape bankruptcy.[92]
The court will declare the company’s bankruptcy in the following cases:
(i) the creditors fail to convene the creditors meeting;[93]
(ii) the creditors meeting fails to approve their resolution;[94]
(iii) the company in bankruptcy has no money or other assets to pay the bankruptcy fee or advance the bankruptcy charges in case the petitioner is the company;[95]
(v) after the acceptance of the petition for bankruptcy proceedings, the company is unable to pay for the bankruptcy charges;[96]
(vi) no recovery plan is duly proposed or approved;[97] or
(vii) the company fails to implement the recovery plan.[98]
Process: The court’s decision to declare a company bankrupt will be sent to the judgment enforcement agency. The judgment enforcement agency will open a bank account and then request the Receiver to start liquidating the assets of the company in bankruptcy.[99]
Discharge of secured debts: After the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, based on the Receiver’s proposal, the judge will settle the secured debts in one of the following ways:
(i) in case the secured assets are used to implement the business recovery procedures, the settlement thereof is subject to the creditors meeting’s resolution; or
(ii) in case the company does not implement the business recovery procedures or the secured assets are unnecessary for the business recovery procedures,
(a) if the secured agreements are due, the secured assets will be settled in accordance with such agreements; or
(b) if the secured agreements are undue, such agreements will be suspended and the secured debts will be settled before the declaration of bankruptcy.[100]
In general, a secured creditor will be given priority over unsecured creditors regarding certain assets of the bankrupt enterprise. However, under Vietnamese bankruptcy law, such priority comes with a cost. In particular:
(i) if the creditors meeting (comprising of unsecured and partly-secured creditors) may decide to use a secured asset for business recovery plan of the bankrupt enterprise, then the secured creditor may not be able to enforce the secured assets until such time as decided by the creditors. Given a secured creditor is not entitled to vote at the creditors’ meeting, this may make secured creditors less advantageous than unsecured creditors;
(ii) if a secured creditor completes enforcing the relevant secured assets and the value of the secured assets is still less than the amount owing to the secured creditor then logically, the secured creditor should be considered as an unsecured creditor for the bankrupt enterprise. However, there is no clear provision under the bankruptcy law which allows a secured creditor to be treated as unsecured creditor after enforcement of the relevant secured assets. The law allows partly secured creditor to join a creditors’ meeting. But classification of partly secured creditor seems to be made very early in the bankruptcy proceeding and there is no clear procedure for amendment of the list of creditors once enforcement of secured assets is complete; and
(iii) A decision of the creditors’ meeting, which will bind all creditors, require (a) more than half of the unsecured creditors to present, and (b) the consents of unsecured creditors represent at least 65% of the unsecured debts. The wording suggests that partly unsecured creditors are not entitled to vote in a creditors’ meeting. It is not clear why the Bankruptcy Law 2014 has such a provision. Since the counting of vote in the creditors’ meeting should be based on the pool of unsecured debt rather than unsecured creditor.
Priority of assets distribution: Where the court decides to declare the bankruptcy of the company, the assets of such company will be distributed in the priority order of:
(i) bankruptcy charges,
(ii) unpaid salary, severance allowances, social insurance, health insurance and other benefits of its employees,
(iii) the debts arising after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings in order to recover the company’s business activities, and
(iv) due financial obligations to the State, unsecured debts payable to the creditors named in the list of creditors and secured debts which have not been settled since the value of the secured assets are not enough to pay the debts.[101]
(v) In addition, if the company in bankruptcy is a financial institution and has received financial support including special loan from the Government, then such Government support may take precedence over all other liabilities of such company.[102]
Termination of the liquidation procedures: The judgment enforcement agency will decide to terminate the assets liquidation procedures when the company has no more assets to carry out the assets distribution or the assets distribution has been fully completed.[103]
Under the Bankruptcy Law 2014, the following transactions may be held by the court to be invalid if conducted within six months prior to the date the Court issues the decision to commence the bankruptcy proceedings:
(i) payment of or to set-off the undue debts in favour of the creditors or with the amount of money greater than the undue debts;
(ii) transactions relating to the asset transfers which are not based on the market price;
(iii) swapping the unsecured debts to secured debts or partly secured debts;
(iv) transactions out of business purposes of the company;
(v) donation of the assets; and
(vi) other transactions for the purpose of disposing of assets of the company.
An 18 month period applies to the above transactions with the related party of the company.[105]
Vietnamese law is not clear whether a shareholder or member could become a creditor of the relevant JSC or LLC in cases:
(i) the relevant JSC or LLC has declared to pay dividend to its members or shareholders but fail to pay; and
(ii) the shareholders or members exercise the right to require the relevant JSC or LLC to buy back or redeem its share or capital contribution pursuant to a redeemable preference shares or an involuntary buy-back decision (see Nguyen Quang Vu – Principles of Vietnam’s Enterprise Law (Vol.1) – Section 64 and from 79.13 to 79.15).
On the one hand, in the context described at 9.26, a shareholder or member may be considered as a “creditor” (chủ nợ) of the relevant JSC or LLC because:
(i) a creditor is defined to mean an individual or organisation who has the right to request the relevant JSC or LLC to pay a debt (khoản nợ);
(ii) under the Enterprise Law 2014, an ordinary shareholder of a JSC has the right to receive dividend as decided by the Shareholders Meeting.[106] A dividend preference shareholder has the right to receive dividend in accordance with the terms of the dividend preference shares.[107] Therefore, an ordinary shareholder or a dividend preference shareholder could arguably be considered as a creditor of the JSC since the shareholder has the right to require the JSC to pay dividend in accordance with decision of the Shareholders Meeting or the terms of the dividend preference shares;
(iii) under the Enterprise Law 2014, an ordinary shareholder of a JSC has the right to require the JSC to buy back its shares in certain circumstance (see Nguyen Quang Vu – Principles of Vietnam’s Enterprise Law (Vol.1) – Section 79) and a redeemable preference shareholder has the right to require the JSC to buy back its shares in accordance with the terms of the redeemable preference shares. Therefore, an ordinary shareholder or a redeemable preference shareholder could arguably be considered as a creditor of the JSC since the shareholder has the right to require the JSC to buy back its shares in certain circumstances; and
(iv) similar arguments can be made regarding members of an LLC.[108]
On the other hand, Article 54.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014 provides that after liquidating the assets of a bankrupt company, the assets, which remain after paying all creditors of the company in full, will belong to shareholders or members of the relevant JSC or LLC. One may rely on this provision to argue that all payments due to a shareholder or member will have a lower ranking than payments due to creditors of the company during a bankruptcy proceeding. However, this seems to be an unreasonable argument since there is nothing, which prohibits a person from being both shareholders and creditors of the company. In the case of JSCs, the Bankruptcy Law 2014 also does not distinguish the liquidation preference between (1) shareholders holding redeemable preference shares and (2) shareholders holding ordinary shares or other classes of shares or other creditors of the JSCs.
-----------------------[1] Article 195.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[3] Article 195.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[4] Article 195.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[5] Article 195.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[6] Article 195.4(c) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[7] Article 195.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[8] Articles 195.5 and 195.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[9] Article 195.2(c) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[10] Article 195.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[11] Article 194.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[12] Article 194.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[13] Article 194.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[14] Article 194.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[15] Article 195.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[16] Articles 194.6 and 194.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[17] Article 194.4 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[18] Article 194.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[19] Article 194.6 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[20] Article 4.16 of the Enterprise Law 2005 does not contain the word “form” in the term company conversion.
[21] Article 197 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[22] Article 198 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[23] Article 196 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[24] Article 199 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[25] Article 198.1(c) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[26] Articles 196.3, 197.3, and 198.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[27] Articles 196.3, 197.3, and 198.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[28] Article 197.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[29] Articles 196.4, 197.4, and 198.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[30] Article 200.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[31] Article 200.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[32] Article 200.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[33] Article 57.2 of Decree 78/2015.
[34] Article 201.1(a) – (c) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[35] Quyết định giải thể doanh nghiệp
[36] Article 202.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[37] Article 202.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[38] Article 202.4 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[39] Article 202.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[40] Article 202.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[41] Article 202.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[42] Article 202.1(c) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[43] Article 202.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[44] Article 202.6 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[45] Article 202.6 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[46] Article 202.7 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[47] Article 204.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[48] Article 40.3(d) of Decree 102/2010.
[49] Article 204.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[50] Article 204.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[51] Article 40.5 of Decree 102/2010.
[52] Article 202.8 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[53] Article 205 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[54] Article 211.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[55] Article 203.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[56] Article 203.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[57] Article 203.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[58] Article 203.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[59] Article 203.2 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[60] Article 203.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[61] Article 203.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[62] Article 203.6 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[63] The Law on Bankruptcy of the National Assembly dated 19 June 2014 (Bankruptcy Law 2014).
[64] Article 4.1 of Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[65] Resolution 3 of the Judges’ Council of Supreme People’s Court dated 28 April 2005 guiding the implementation of a number of provisions of the Law on Bankruptcy (Resolution 3/2005).
[66] Article 2.1(a) of Resolution 3/2005.
[67] Articles 5.1 and 26.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[68] Article 5.5 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[69] Articles 37.1 and 37.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[70] Article 38 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[71] Articles 8.1 and 8.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[72] Article 42.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[73] Article 43 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[74] Article 45.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[75] Article 16 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[76] Articles 41.3, 53.2, and 53.3 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[77] Article 41.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[78] Article 48.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[79] Article 49 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[80] Article 65.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[81] Article 65.3 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[82] Article 66 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[83] Article 67.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[84] Articles 75.1, 81.1 and 83.1(b) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[85] Article 79.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[86] Article 81.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[87] Articles 86.1 and 86.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[88] Article 87.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[89] Article 89 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[90] Article 92.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[91] Article 93.2 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[92] Article 95.1(a) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[93] Article 80.3 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[94] Article 83.4 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[95] Article 105.1(a) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[96] Article 105.1(b) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[97] Articles 107.2(a) and 107.2(b) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[98] Article 95.1(b), 95.1(c), 96.2 and 107.2(c) of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[99] Article 120.2(a) and 121.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[100] Article 53.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[101] Article 54.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[102] Article 100 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[103] Article 126 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[104] Article 59.1 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[105] Articles 59.2 and 59.3 of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.
[106] Article 114.1(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[107] Article 117.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[108] Articles 50.3 and 52. of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[1] Article 192.1 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[2] Article 192.4 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[3] Một phần phần vốn góp, cổ phần của các thành viên, cổ đông cùng với tài sản tương ứng với giá trị phần vốn góp, cổ phần được chia sang cho các công ty mới theo tỷ lệ sở hữu trong công ty bị chia và tương ứng giá trị tài sản được chuyển cho công ty mới
[4] Article 192.1(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[5] Toàn bộ phần vốn góp, cổ phần của một hoặc một số thành viên, cổ đông cùng với tài sản tương ứng với giá trị cổ phần, phần vốn góp họ được chuyển sang cho các công ty mới
[6] Article 192.1(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[7] Members of a Multiple LLC, shareholders of a JSC or company owner of a Single LLC.
[8] Article 192.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[9] Article 192.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[10] Article 192.2(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[11] Article 192.2(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[12] Article 192.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[13] Article 192.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[14] Article 192.4 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[15] Members of a Multiple LLC, shareholders of a JSC or company owner of a Single LLC.
[16] Article 193.4(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[17] Article 193.4(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[18] Article 193.4(a) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[19] Article 193.4(b) of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[20] Article 193.3 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
[21] Article 193.5 of the Enterprise Law 2014.
Please Login or Register for Free now to view all updates and articles
In addition to free-to-view updates and articles, you can also subscribe to the full Legal Centrix Vietnam Service including access to:
Legal Centrix is trusted by top law and accounting firms.
Venture North Law Limited (VNLaw) is a Vietnamese law firm established by Nguyen Quang Vu, a business lawyer with more than 17 years of experience. VNLaw is a boutique professional law firm focusing on corporate, commercial and M&A practices in Vietnam. Our goal is to be an efficient, innovative and client-friendly firm. To achieve that goal, we are designing a working environment and a compensation system which encourage our lawyers to provide more efficient services to clients and to focus on the long term benefit of the firm.
Click here to view the author's profile
Nguyen Quang Vu, Managing Partner
vu.nq@vnlaw.com.vn
Nguyen H. Duy, Associate
duy.nh@vnlaw.com.vn
Nguyen Bich Ngoc, Partner
ngoc.nb@vnlaw.com.vn
Hoang Thi T. Thuy, Partner
thuy.htt@vnlaw.com.vn
Copyright © 1997 - 2024 Legal Centrix. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Some text to show in popup